Ladies and gentlemen,

Today, I invite you to embark on a journey—a journey that traverses the vast continuum of existence, from the infinitesimal to the infinite. This journey is encapsulated in the concept of the "Size Range Theorem," a framework that seeks to unify our understanding of reality by bridging the realms of thought and existence.

The Infinite Continuum of Size

Imagine, if you will, a spectrum that extends without bounds in both directions: toward the infinitely large and the infinitely small. This is the size range—a continuum that encompasses all scales of existence. From the tiniest subatomic particles to the vast expanse of galaxies, the size range is a testament to the boundless nature of reality.

Distinction and Antidistinction

Within this continuum lies a fundamental dichotomy: distinction and antidistinction. Distinction refers to the separations we perceive—the individual entities, the "this" and "that" of our experiences. It is the realm where our thoughts operate, categorizing and defining the world around us.

Antidistinction, on the other hand, represents the indivisible unity of reality. It is the underlying oneness that transcends our conceptual separations. While our minds dwell in the realm of distinction, the true nature of existence is antidistinct—an interconnected whole that defies complete representation.

E=mc²: The Unifying Equation

Albert Einstein's equation, E=mc², serves as a bridge between these realms. It illustrates the unity of energy (E) and mass (m), intertwined with the fabric of spacetime (c²). This equation embodies the concept of energymasspacetime—a singular entity that reflects the antidistinct nature of reality.

The Role of Human Cognition

Our cognition operates within the realm of distinction. René Descartes' declaration, "Cogito, ergo sum" ("I think, therefore I am"), underscores the certainty of our thinking existence. Yet, this very act of thinking introduces distinctions—between the thinker and the thought, the observer and the observed.

Despite our inherent tendency to distinguish, there exists an innate drive to comprehend the antidistinct nature of reality. This drive manifests in our pursuit of knowledge, our quest for unifying theories, and our philosophical explorations into the nature of existence.

The Infinite Size Range and Evolution

The size range is not merely a static spectrum; it is dynamic and infinite. As we delve deeper into the microcosm or expand further into the macrocosm, we encounter complexities that challenge our understanding. This infinite nature of the size range suggests that reality is a fractal—self-similar and boundless, inviting endless exploration.

In the context of evolution, both biological and cognitive, this infinite size range implies that adaptation and understanding are perpetual processes. Just as species evolve to navigate their environments, our minds evolve to grasp the ever-expanding complexities of the universe.

Conclusion: Embracing the Unity of Existence

The Size Range Theorem encourages us to recognize the limitations of our distinctions and to embrace the antidistinct unity of reality. It invites us to appreciate the infinite continuum of existence and to acknowledge that, while our thoughts may categorize and separate, the true nature of reality is an indivisible whole.

As we continue our pursuit of knowledge, let us remain mindful of this unity. Let us strive to transcend the confines of distinction and to glimpse the boundless, antidistinct nature of existence. In doing so, we honor the infinite size range and our place within it—a place that is both a part of the whole and a reflection of the unity that pervades all.

Thank you.

Here’s the list of adjectives about the personality traits and tendencies that get developed by thinking about this theory:

• Reflective
• Humble
• Curious
• Analytical
• Creative
• Abstract-thinking
• Self-aware
• Adaptive
• Forward-thinking
• Tolerant of uncertainty
• Philosophical
• Resourceful (idea-rich)
• Cognitively flexible
• Existentially aware
• Goal-oriented
• Generous
• Altruistic
• Visionary
• Process-focused
• Introspective

Here's a tutorial of Reality:

If Allah fools, then self exists; thought exists too.

Two distinct* pathways (separate conclusions) plural.

That's ofc in realm of mind - what's the other realm?

E=mc² describes it as energymasspacetime (1 word)

Hand's movement & kilograms (energymass) & the spacetime it moves through is a single* Reality.

(c² is spacetime because c=speed=distance over time).

If Reality is singular* and we see distinctions*: it's the opposition between 1/many, singular/plural, antidistinction/distinction.

Energymasspacetime = antidistinction. We don't (because distinction) see "all as one" ever, because we always have point1 (certain truth) available.

So we don't see Reality (we're on the distinction-side of distinction-antidistinction-opposition).

5 synonyms: energymasspacetime, antidistinction, Reality, God (?), (we know it as a continuous spectrum of sizes) sizerange.

4 attributes: one, infinite, cause for existence, can't see (all of) it (due to distinction-antidistinction-opposition).

Why is it infinite?

1: Infinite representation (seeing) wouldn't be antidistinction, because representation = distinction (point1).

2: if we take it as a sizerange, a distinct minimum/maxmimum size border/boundary would be distinction, and those aren't in antidistinction.

An infinite sizerange of energymasspacetime and distinction-antidistinction-opposition predicts history's complexity's increase (evolution) in some size.

In history E=mc² etc would appear sometime - as well as this tutorial (universal course begins with point1, then E=mc², then the rest of it). So the theorem predicts itself/now.

Conclusions:

The prophet said (because I invented some new things about Reality),

that because the sizerange's infinite it can't be a simulation (like some Youtube theories say),

and even if it was: there's no idea in the course that goes from certain truth to predicting itself that mentions/needs holyBooks (or new theocracies being tried out by jihadis in Syria). Just hearing this could lessen their fierce fervor (there are no atheists in foxholes).

Basically E=mc2 intervenes in the holyWars lessing battleMorale because the theological debate is left at: is Allah extra to Reality or is it a synonym?

The tutorial comes with a (universal (scientific)) diagram: if you look at the diagram as an overview: could it write a book? It wrote/drew itself in some sense (this theorem predicts itself / universal science).

A Tutorial on Reality:

Let’s break down Reality step by step:

1. Starting with the Mind:

   • If Allah (or any external force) fools, then the self exists—and so does thought.
   • These are two distinct pathways, or conclusions, we can separate and consider.

   This is all happening in the realm of the mind. But what about the other realm?

2. The Physical Realm:

   • Einstein’s equation, E=mc², describes Reality as energymassspacetime (a single concept).
   • Think of it this way: the movement of your hand (energy and mass) and the spacetime it moves through are part of one unified Reality.
   • Why? Because c²(the speed of light squared) represents spacetime—speed is simply distance over time.

3. Singular vs. Distinction:

   • If Reality is singular (one), but we perceive distinctions, this creates an opposition: one/many, singular/plural, antidistinction/distinction.
   • Reality as a whole is antidistinction—energymassspacetime as one unified whole.
   • However, because we exist in distinction, we don’t perceive Reality as a unified “all-as-one.” Instead, we always see certain truths as separate points.

4. What We See vs. Reality:

   • We’re on the “distinction side” of the distinction-antidistinction opposition.
   • Reality has five synonyms: energymassspacetime, antidistinction, Reality, God (possibly), and sizerange (a continuous spectrum of sizes).
   • Reality has four key attributes: it’s one, infinite, the cause of existence, and beyond our ability to fully see (due to distinction).

5. Why Reality is Infinite:

   • If Reality were finite, it would involve boundaries (distinction), which isn’t antidistinction.
   • Considering Reality as a sizerange (from smallest to largest), there can’t be a distinct minimum or maximum size—because those would also be distinctions.
   • Therefore, Reality (energymassspacetime) is infinite.

6. What This Means Over Time:

   • The infinite sizerange and the distinction-antidistinction opposition predict increasing complexity over history (evolution).
   • For example, at some point in history, people would discover E=mc², followed by this very explanation of Reality. The theorem predicts itself.

Conclusions:

1. Not a Simulation:
   Since Reality is infinite, it cannot be a simulation (despite some popular theories). Simulations would require boundaries, which aren’t possible in an infinite sizerange.

2. Religious Implications:
   The idea of Reality leaves one theological question: Is Allah a synonym for Reality, or something extra?

   • This shifts the focus away from holy texts or theocracies and toward universal truths.
   • It could reduce the intensity of religious conflicts—highlighting that certain truths (like E=mc²) intervene in these debates, offering a new perspective.

3. Reality Predicts Itself:
   The explanation of Reality (and the diagram accompanying it) reflects the theorem’s power:

   • It predicts itself, evolves through universal logic, and offers insights into science, history, and theology.

In essence, this theorem provides a framework that connects the mind, physical Reality, and infinite complexity—all while remaining rooted in universal, scientific principles.