A psychiatrist grasped my theorem and went to his psychiatrist:
— “How are you? What have you done today?”
— “I just stumbled upon a theorem – a re-definition of the word Reality: it’s both singular and plural, i.e. distinct (the Cogito side) versus anti-distinct (E = mc² points that way...).
Apparently the opposition between distinction and antidistinction gives two proofs that the sizescale is infinite – a chain of infinitely tiny causal steps from the very smallest to the very largest scientifically.
The most interesting link to intellectual history is that ancient religious peoples thought Reality (defined as "That (singular) of which all is parts (plural)") has four attributes (according to the philosopher it´s infinity is proven by

1. infinite representation ≠ anti-distinction, and

2. no (distinct) max/min sizes within anti-distinction / energymasspacetime.
   So the four attributes are: singular (monotheistic), cause/origin (‘of the world’), infinite, and unseeable – you can’t view the whole because of the distinction/antidistinction split (where Cogito is the distinction side of the coin).”

Thus, in those four attributes “Reality” and “God” are rivals – or synonyms – for ancient peoples, or for sizerange / energymasspacetime / antidistinction.

Now comes this finding (the theorem) that you can move from Descartes (Cogito) to Einstein and conclude that size-range / energy-mass-space-time didn´t write [insert random foreign dogma], and that the theorem (apparently ‘universal’) could have been formulated in, say, the year 1700s but only popped up around 2025.

And time turns out to be infinite as well (because energymasspacetime is, if the sizescale is).

— “I see… Medicine?”

• E = mc² is energy-mass-space-time, because c is a velocity, and velocity is space over time, i.e. space-time; energy-mass (E = m…) is multiplied by c², i.e. by space-time.

• “Cogito (ergo sum)”– you can google it or ask AI if you don’t already know that proof of distinct things.

You have a thinker because if you were to be deceived (even by an almighty being...), you would still be there (as the one who “in that case is being deceived”; so even if you’re deceived, You are still present).

On the same note: if you are deceived, then the deception is a thought process—i.e., thoughts exist.

Therefore, thinker and thought exist—and they are plural, meaning they are distinct from each other.

That is, the opposite of singular or anti-distinction (everything as one; such as how E=mc² describes reality as energy-mass and space-time as the same).

So you, who live in the plural world, cannot see the singular (i.e., E=mc² becomes invisible but is a single, anti-distinct energy-mass-space-time).

And furthermore, the size scale is infinite.

Then one can conclude: if the size scale is infinite, then energy-mass-space-time is also infinite, and thus time is infinite.

So just by starting from the certain truth “thinker and thought exist,” one can reason their way to the infinity of time.

Could incommon/shared knowledge bring more peace to earth?